请登陆我们的网站首页  VISIT THE MAIN HomeShop SITE

Last summer, a critical “cultural exchange” led to another kind of unexpected trajectory, meeting Italians in the hutong, meeting 1,500 bricks, all the serendipitous occasions* to generate a certain interest in something as random as the building block, parts and parcel, production and pieces. If we should start from the elementary, we come upon the city, piles in preparation, rubble. It’s a deception, that solidity, for things break and fall apart as much as they are constructed. Such temporalities come fired here in coal burning kilns—in both an economic and an environmental sense a dangerous consideration of only the momentary—things are just not built to last. Our building block seems more a blockade than an independent solidity, less object (or part thereof), but a conjunctive to be considered alongside the motion around it: the brick is door stop and speed bump and chalk all in one. Solidity delineates, separates, blocks, protects and becomes an object of relation. Then add sticky rice, and we’ve got all the time in the world.

Mud brick by Stephanie Shepherd

Artists Stephanie Shepherd and Barbara Balfour recently came by HomeShop and we happened to stumble upon our common interest in sticky rice and bricks, though Stephanie has taken it to a critical experimental level, self-concocting her own re-mixture of an ancient technique involving a sticky rice mortar (found dating back to the North-South Dynasty, 386-589) to attempt an ultra durable block similar to those found as parking markers all over the city. A thousand year old blockade, a point which we would be invited to keep coming back to again and again. To delineate or separate, block or protect, to become an object of relation. These are continuities more than divisions as we might have first thought, the building blocks of an imagination for another time-sense.

from the series “Behind the Restaurant”, by Barbara Balfour

Would it be possible to say the same for something non-created, or to ask further, what forms of imagination take place in a way of seeing? Barbara’s series of photographs of the backside of the Tuanjiehu branch of Beijing’s famous 大董 Dadong Roast Duck restaurant take on a similar time quality, though here solidity comes in the form of constancy and routine. Continuities embed themselves in the daily processes behind, outside of and next to the restaurant’s main activities of cooking and eating. People enter in and out, make and receive deliveries, take inventory, line up for staff meetings, take smoke breaks. While the camera maintains a fairly fixed position from her apartment window, the frame is searching, zooming in or out and moving somehow relative to all the action below, an object of relation.

_______
*Further reading about contemporary brick production and serendipity can be found in the second issue of Wear journal, published May 2010. In response to Sportsbabel, I don’t know if better bricks would necessarily slow down the process of killing ourselves, but those were a nice conjoining of material loops. Not what contemporary capitalism is good at at all, indeed.



2 Responses to “sticky rice, roast duck, brick”

  1. sportsbabel

    Why, exactly, do we want things to last? Doesn’t this create monuments and idols and empires and dynasties? Should we not be more concerned with circulation and flow? Everything is not made to last, most certainly, but isn’t the folding of time into the object more interesting than how it unfolds (or is unfolded), as with Stephanie’s rice brick recipe?

    I hope there is roast duck relation to be found next time the flows conjoin….

    你吃饭了吗

  2. sportsbabel

    Bricks, food, waste: everywhere to be found recently, it seems. Hopefully of interest to HomeShop or Stephanie or Barbara (or . . . , or . . . ).